A new blood test promises to predict which people will have severe
allergic reactions to foods according to a new study led by Mount Sinai
researchers and published online today in the The Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.
To detect food
allergies, physicians typically use skin prick tests or blood tests
that measure levels of allergen-specific IgE (sIgE), a protein made by
the immune system. However, these tests cannot predict the severity of allergic reactions. Oral food challenges,
in which specific allergens are given to patients to ingest under
physician supervision to test for signs or symptoms of an allergic
reaction, remain the gold standard for diagnosing food allergy even
though the tests themselves can trigger severe reactions.
In the newly published study, Mount Sinai researchers from The
Mindich Child Health and Development Institute and the Jaffe Food
Allergy Institute report that by counting the numbers of one type of
immune cell activated by exposure to a food, a simple, safe blood test
can accurately predict the severity of each person's allergic reaction
to it. The immune cell measured is the basophil, and the blood test, the
basophil activation test or BAT, requires only a small blood sample and
provides quick results.
"While providing crucial information about their potential for a
severe allergic reaction to a food, having blood drawn for BAT testing
is a much more comfortable procedure than food challenges." says first
author Ying Song, MD. "Although food challenges are widely practiced,
they carry the risk of severe allergic reactions, and we believe BAT
testing will provide accurate information in a safer manner," says Dr.
Song, also a researcher in the Jaffe Food Allergy Institute at The Mount
Sinai Hospital.
"Although the blood basophil activation test has been shown to be an
important addition to the tools available for discriminating between
allergic and non-allergic individuals and predicting the severity of food allergy
reactions, at this time it is only approved for research purposes,"
says senior author Xiu-Min Li, MD, Professor of Pediatrics at the Icahn
School of Medicine.
Investigators took blood samples from 67 patients, ages 12 to 45
years, who also underwent a food challenge with a placebo or with
peanut, tree nut, fish, shellfish, or sesame. The goal was to see if the
BAT test results would correlate with food challenge results. The study
was double blinded, so neither researchers nor patients knew which
person received a placebo or one of the allergens, which were
administered at random.
Before the randomized food challenge, researchers collected blood
from all patients and analyzed the results, which showed a strong
correlation between BAT testing data and food challenge severity scores.
This finding provides evidence that BAT testing can reduce the need for
food challenges not only for peanut, but also for tree nut, fish,
shellfish, and sesame and perhaps for other foods.
SOURCE:
Medicalxpress and Provided by
The Mount Sinai Hospital



No comments:
Post a Comment